Innocent until proven guilty? Lawyer says this is not true for principal accused of smoking at school
by FRED PACE, EDITOR
Sep 27, 2011 | 12377 views | 8 8 comments | 29 29 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Innocent until proven guilty…this is a standard belief of America’s justice system, but is it true?

Madison attorney Peter Hendricks claims his client, former Boone County Career & Technical Center principal Keith Phipps, is facing exactly the opposite situation in the eyes of both the public and the legal system.

“In my opinion, Mr. Phipps has become the victim of a situation in which he has been presumed guilty and must now prove himself innocent,” Hendricks told the Coal Valley News last week. “Despite the fact that charges against him have been dropped and he has not been charged or indicted by anyone else, he continues to have to prove himself innocent on a daily basis.”

Phipps was accused by the West Virginia State Police of purchasing too much allergy medicine that contained too much pseudoephedrine or other precursor chemicals used in the manufacturing of methamphetamine.

An accusation that Phipps and a teacher smoked meth inside the school, and even in the principal’s office, has also circulated throughout the public and the media since his arrest in May.

“Mr. Phipps reputation has been harmed by this clearly careless and improper investigation,” Hendricks said.

The state’s charges against Phipps were dropped Sept. 1, but it has been rumored that this was to allow federal investigators to pick up the case.

About two weeks ago, federal agents and state police raided the home Phipps shares with his wife and adult son. After several hours of searching, the agencies reported they took out guns and ammunition.

Hendricks said no federal charges or indictments have been made against Phipps and to comment as to why the home was raided would be purely speculative.

Phipps told a local television station that federal agents found nothing in his home related to any drug activity.

“They did however take some family heirloom guns. And also my son has a collection of guns,” he said. “Several. I'm not a gun collector myself, even though that has been said, but I do have 3 or 4 guns that have been gifts, handed down (my father is deceased) that were his. And they took all those.”

Hendricks says his client is speaking out now in order to clear his name.

“Most of these media reports have been one-sided,” he said. “Mr. Phipps and I want to offer some facts regarding this case.”

Hendricks said had a simple review of the actual purchases of the allergy medicines by Phipps at the pharmacies listed in the criminal complaint been done, it would have shown that two of the four products relied upon for a conviction in the case do not qualify as precursor chemicals for the manufacture of meth.

“The single active ingredient of each product must contain either ephedrine, pseudoephedrine or phenylpropanolamine and cannot be combined with any other active ingredient, which means two of the products purchased do not qualify,” he explained.

Hendricks added that the investigation also failed to even address the gram count of the products purchased.

“The four purchases identified in the criminal complaint totaled 7.2 grams, which is well under or below the therapeutic, recommended dosages of these products,” he said.

Many citizens use allergy medications and Phipps says he is still confused about how, and why, this has happened to him.

“I offered to take any kind of drug testing for anyone, including law enforcement and the school system, but nobody even bothered to do that,” Phipps said.

With 29 years and two months of service in Boone County Schools, Phipps was close to considering early retirement.

“I received a letter from the school system a few weeks ago stating I was suspended without pay and that it would be recommended by the Superintendent of Schools that I be terminated,” he said.

Phipps was originally placed on administrative leave with pay.

School officials said this was because he was only charged with a misdemeanor.

Since the charges have been dropped and no other charges filed, Phipps still wonders why he is being targeted for termination.

“What happened to innocent until proven guilty?” he asked. “I have been found guilty of nothing and now I am not even charged with anything.”

A source within the school system, and the school system’s letter to Phipps, appear to indicate that the school is looking at the suspension and recommended termination on the grounds of Phipps not fulfilling his responsibilities as a principal and employee of Boone County Schools.

The fact that meth residue was found inside the school and in the principal’s office appear to indicate the school system may accuse Phipps of not performing his required duties as principal.

“The largest concentration of meth residue was found in the girls’ bathroom,” Hendricks said. “The principal’s office was 13th on the list.”

Hendricks said anyone could have smoked meth inside the school, including students, teachers, visitors and even janitors that cleaned the school at night.

“Mr. Phipps can’t be there 24 hours a day, 7 days a week watching everyone at the same time,” Hendricks said.

Hendricks said the alleged “crime scene” was cleaned up prior to Phipps defense team and expert witnesses being allowed to perform their own tests.

“If this stuff was so contaminated, why were people from the general public and those in the school system taking stuff from the dumpsters home with them?” Hendricks asked. “Why wasn’t this stuff guarded and taken for proper disposal? I would like to see where they took the allegedly contaminated items. I would like to see if the list of contaminated stuff removed from the school matches the list of contaminated stuff dropped off at the disposal site.”

He also wondered if all of the other schools in Boone County have been tested for drug residue.

“Are they testing all the schools?”

Hendricks added that no meth labs were found, no physical evidence has been found and no credible witnesses have come forward.

“I think any jury, or the general public for that matter, is going to believe statements from self-confessed criminals,” he said. “The case was dismissed by the state, and for good reason, because they had no case.”

Hendricks says, however, this hasn’t stopped the public and the school system from prosecuting his client.

“The investigators and the media have already made Mr. Phipps guilty in the eyes of the public and the school system now feels the pressure to do something about it, even if they have no proof, no evidence or no guilty verdict,” he said.

The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads, in part, “No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law...”

What this means, in plain terms, is that constitutionally you cannot be executed, imprisoned, or fined without the proper course of justice taking place. Due process, itself, is not defined in the constitution, but is universally recognized as meaning what is termed as “a fair trial.”

Going forward from there, a fair trial by a jury of one’s peers requires that the jurors approach the case with the thought that the prosecution is required to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Since the trial begins with the prosecution not having introduced a single piece of evidence, it follows that a defendant must be considered innocent, until proven guilty.

“Investigators and the media have already put out the theory to the public that Mr. Phipps was buying these products to make meth and that he smoked meth in the school,” Hendricks said. “He now is to prove he is innocent, and that isn’t right. He should be considered innocent, until proven guilty, by the legal system, the school system, the media and the public.”

Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ddtally1
|
September 28, 2011
Thank you, Coal Valley News, for publishing an enlightening article about the Phipps case. Until now, Mr. Phipps has been villainized by the media, plundered by the Feds, and victimized by local law enforcement. I hope to see Mr. Phipps reclaim his good name, returned to his job as principal at the vocational school, and begin a healing process that could take the rest of his life to complete. I hope this case becomes a lesson to all of us about the toxicity of hearsay and media carelessness. Your article poses possibilities that need to be explored-- and that, my friend, is GREAT journalism!
lilashirl
|
September 28, 2011
The State of West Virginia should conduct an "in house" investigation of the Boone County Schools'Administration and the Boone County detachment of the State Police
farinesswatchdog
|
September 28, 2011
I am thrilled that someone is finally printing the truth!! This is a great day for Boone County WV. All the gossip has been so ugly and unfair to Mr. Phipps and his family. The focus should be on the Boone County Board of Education. An investigation should begin immediately on every board member and how all the malicious rumors got started. Again, thank you for this article.
cindarella1
|
September 28, 2011
Anyone that know Keith Phipps know how much he loves children. He would never do anything to harm them! His history with children proves this! It is very sad that Keith and his wonderful family are going through this. He should NOT have to prove his innocents when he had done NOTHING WRONG. Please people dont be afraid to stand beside him and his family through this difficult time!!!! "NOT GUILTY" NOW TREAT HIM THIS WAY!!!
shot
|
September 28, 2011
Once more Boone County is looking ignorant due to poor investigating and the desire to jump on any gossip. We should and do expect more from our educational leaders, but we didn't get it this time. People in power positions must be more than power mongers.
wvsupergirl78
|
September 28, 2011
I totally agree that Mr. Phipps must now prove he is innocent, which is not what are justice system is supposed to be about. This type of situation is happening every day in our courts, where people have to prove they are not guilty. This is wrong and must change. This has turned into a witch-hunt and could happen to any of us. We should stand against this type of violation of a person's rights. Which one of us will be next? This man deserves to be treated fairly, like any of us would want to be treated if we were accused of something we did not do.
lovemyguns
|
September 27, 2011
I find it very disturbing that federal officials can raid your home and confiscate every gun based on flimsy, unsubstantiated Boone County rumors. So when will Mr. Phipps get his guns back? His constitutional right to a fair trial has been trampled and his first amendment right to bear arms was physically removed. It is a sad day in West Virginia when you have to choose between a runny nose and your guns.
justicewatch
|
September 27, 2011
Shame, shame, shame on you authorities, media, and school district! Mr. Phipps HAS been viciously maligned by a slanderous investigation, an over-zealous tv reporter, and a board of education who should have reviewed facts instead of hearsay. This type of treatment to an apparent law-abiding citizen should not happen in America - let alone, West by-God Virginia! I am sick about this and wonder which any allergy medicine-purchasing consumer in Boone County will be next.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: