Woman questions use of lie detector tests
5 years ago | 220 views | 0 0 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Dear Editor:

Why do they continue to do lie detector tests if they are not admissible in court? If someone is asked to take a lie detector test and they refuse, aren't they admitting they are guilty?

If they are not guilty, anyone should be ready to prove their innocence.

Speaking of guilt, how can people live with themselves and act innocent if they were the cause of another person's death.

It makes you wonder just what goes through the guilty person's mind after they cause a death.

I wonder if they realize what the family that is left behind is going through. Do they care? Does it haunt them? Do they care at all?

What about the children left behind or their father, mother, sister, or brother?

These people lost someone they loved, but a guilty person or persons took that life.

The Ten Commandments say, "Thou shalt not kill." It doesn't say some killings are okay. No one has the right to take a life. DUI killing is no accident, shooting is no accident, and supplying drugs that cause a person's death is no accident.

In my opinion, a witness that sets back and holds information from law enforcement is no more just than the guilty.

Sincerely,

Brenda Stiles

Danville
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
report abuse...

Express yourself:
We're glad to give you a forum to air your point of view on issues important to this community. We just ask that you keep things civil. Leave out the personal attacks. Do not use offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or assail anyone's personal or religious beliefs. For anyone who can't be civil, we reserve the right to remove your material. We also reserve the right to ban users who violate our visitor's agreement.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
Gasoline Prices
Sponsored By:

Recipes
Sponsored By: